�x�Ӹ��x��̎���像Uˮ��(sh��)�(y��n)�о�
����ժҪ: |
�M(j��n)���x�Ӹ��x��̎���像Uˮ���о�����(du��)Ӱ�����pH��CA��CMe(Ħ����),���x�ӏ�(qi��ng)��,�����x�r(sh��)�g��ͨ�������M(j��n)���ˌ�(sh��)�(y��n)�о�����(sh��)�(y��n)�Y(ji��)���������x�ӷ��x�x�����f�p���?y��n)飺Cd2+>Zn2+>Fe2+ >Cu2+>Ni2+,����(d��ng)CA��CMe��2.5��3��1,��pH��8.5��9���x�ӏ�(qi��ng)�Ȳ�����0.0001 mol/L�r(sh��),���x�Ӹ��x��(du��)�k,���\���~,��懵Ƚ����x�Ӿ��кܸߵ�ȥ����,��Cd2+��Zn2+,��Fe 2+,��Ni 2+��Cu2+���������ͷքe���_(d��)0.05,��0.20,��0.22��0.28��0.33 mg/L,��̎������像Uˮ����Ⱦ���Ⱦ��_(d��)���ŷŘ�(bi��o)��(zh��n),����ĭ�a(ch��n)Ʒ���k���\,���~,���Ʒλ�քe�_(d��)��3.2����9.3%,��18.1%��13.2%,�����ИO�ߵ��YԴ���Ճr(ji��)ֵ�� |
Ӣ��ժҪ: |
In this study, ion flotation method was used to dispose the electroplating wastewater. The effects of pH value, the ratio of CA��CMe,ion strength, flotation time, volume of aeration on the treatment of the electroplating wastewater were studied. Experimental results showed that the decreasing order to separate the ions was Cd2+>Zn2+>Fe2+>Cu2+>Ni2+. The preferential segregation for the cadmium, zinc, copper, nickel was that the ratio of CA��CMe was 2.5��3.1, pH value was 8.5��9, and the ion strength was less than 0.0001 mol/L. In this case, the residual concentrations of the Cd2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ were 0.05, 0.20, 0.22,0.28 and 0.33 mg/L, respectively. After electroplating wastewater were disposed, the pollutant concentration complied with the discharge standard. The concentrations of the chromium, copper and nickel in the disposal froth product were 3.2��,9.3%,18.1% and 13.2%, respectively, which showed that there was a great reclamation value. |

ʹ����“��һ��”��������“���v�h(hu��n)���W(w��ng)”
�����Ҫ�˽����Ԕ��(x��)�ă�(n��i)��,��Ո(q��ng)�c(di��n)�����d 201407161044035682.zip
���dԓ����Ո(q��ng)���,�����߀���DZ��W(w��ng)��(hu��)�T��Ո(q��ng)��ע��(c��)